Policy
HAI produces critical scholarship on AI governance and convenes national and global AI discussions. We engage with leaders and policymakers worldwide to ensure AI is designed to augment human capabilities and benefit society.
Recently Published in Policy Publications
This brief introduces a generative AI agent architecture that can simulate the attitudes of more than 1,000 real people in response to major social science survey questions.
This brief introduces a generative AI agent architecture that can simulate the attitudes of more than 1,000 real people in response to major social science survey questions.
This brief presents an analysis of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek’s talent base and calls for U.S. policymakers to reinvest in competing to attract and retain global AI talent.
This brief presents an analysis of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek’s talent base and calls for U.S. policymakers to reinvest in competing to attract and retain global AI talent.
Mind the (Language) Gap: Mapping the Challenges of LLM Development in Low-Resource Language Contexts
This white paper maps the LLM development landscape for low-resource languages, highlighting challenges, trade-offs, and strategies to increase investment; prioritize cross-disciplinary, community-driven development; and ensure fair data ownership.
Mind the (Language) Gap: Mapping the Challenges of LLM Development in Low-Resource Language Contexts
This white paper maps the LLM development landscape for low-resource languages, highlighting challenges, trade-offs, and strategies to increase investment; prioritize cross-disciplinary, community-driven development; and ensure fair data ownership.
In this response to a request for information issued by the National Science Foundation’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (on behalf of the Office of Science and Technology Policy), scholars from Stanford HAI, CRFM, and RegLab urge policymakers to prioritize four areas of policy action in their AI Action Plan: 1) Promote open innovation as a strategic advantage for U.S. competitiveness; 2) Maintain U.S. AI leadership by promoting scientific innovation; 3) Craft evidence-based AI policy that protects Americans without stifling innovation; 4) Empower government leaders with resources and technical expertise to ensure a “whole-of-government” approach to AI governance.
In this response to a request for information issued by the National Science Foundation’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (on behalf of the Office of Science and Technology Policy), scholars from Stanford HAI, CRFM, and RegLab urge policymakers to prioritize four areas of policy action in their AI Action Plan: 1) Promote open innovation as a strategic advantage for U.S. competitiveness; 2) Maintain U.S. AI leadership by promoting scientific innovation; 3) Craft evidence-based AI policy that protects Americans without stifling innovation; 4) Empower government leaders with resources and technical expertise to ensure a “whole-of-government” approach to AI governance.
